{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:RUE
10/1/2015 6:39:57 AM
1
I don't think there would be outlash if there was a age gap/limit on it. Say you are a 7 year member, you can post in #gaming and #offtopic, but nowhere else,unless you play destiny [b]and[/b] link it. I think it would just be a win-win situation. Bungie would have a much smaller #offtopic lashback, making alts would be much more time consuming, and we all win. I agree to a extent with what Bungie is doing, but I can sympathize with people who want to still post without buying destiny.
English
-
That's an excellent point. I'm not sure why they chose to handle this how they did. Being in information technology (IRL) I can only think the data they analyzed supported their decision.
-
So basically in lamans terms, this company is ran by admins who clearly have no sense of their comnunity. Like every other admin in a workplace.
-
[quote]Being in information technology (IRL)[/quote] The acronym IRL is IT, m8.
-
-
[quote]Being in information technology (IRL)[/quote] IRL = In real life I hope you're joking, lol
-
True. I just wish there were some middle ground. Hopefully, they are able to get minor reform to the rule. Id rather some quality members stay here, as it would also hold the community together.
