Hey, man. I don't know about any exceptions, and I don't know if that was or could be a viable option. From DeeJ's post it was clear to me they want to move forward into a new era and also patch a system which made it far too easy for members to operate under a posture of zero accountability. I really don't think it has anything to do with being worthy or not. The team that made the new policy reviewed the data and that data supported the decision. I think it could have been handled differently, but I have nothing to do with anything policy execution related. Due to the new policy, many members will be inclined to act and post with more caution because bans will hold more weight now. Much less than 1% of [i]active[/i] members didn't have an account linked to a Guardian with Destiny play history. And a percentage of those very likely played Destiny, and all they need to do is link their accounts (I came across two legacy members who were able to get squared away yesterday). Could it have been handled differently? Probably, but something had to happen and the benefits outweigh the negative impact. Stay cool. #GetWorkPLaced