Oh no. I have done research. Rather mine is from the library? The cannabis journals? Histories, chemical compounds, uses etc. it's the general trend for educated people to research things they have an opinion on it. Since we are talking about studies and such from credible sources. This year there was a study FDA as well as a university regarding the legalization of mj in Colarado. Nearly all plants in Colorado now produce triple the normal amount of THC, done intentionally. It has become nearly useless for medicinal uses. [i]This[/i] is the argument. Recreational users will tend to alter the plant to produce a better, more intense high. Medicinal use is perfect. My grandfather was given it for his lung, mouth, and esophageal cancers. It helped. Don't get my motivations twisted.
English
-
Edited by DarthBrando: 10/16/2015 5:09:12 PM[b][i][u]you do realize the FDA has ignored 100% of all findings from every single independent college funded research lab (colleges like Harvard BTW) ever done on the substance right?! [/u][/i][/b] Also pls read these; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=criminalization+of+marijuana&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0CBoQgQMwAGoVChMI8uu0qb3HyAIVhsk-Ch2ngw8j And this; https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_the_United_States
-
I never specified the university. I'm almost positive it came from UC Berkeley. I never read anything from FDA without a healthy skepticism. However when several more sources including the same autorities which passed the law in Colorado are all concluding that the cannibis in Colorado is nearly out of medicinal uses due to the artificially high levels of THC being used exclusively to achieve a greater high. Stop dodging my point.
-
Edited by DarthBrando: 10/16/2015 5:27:01 PMIm not even saying just medicine; Marijuana has 15000+ [b][i][u]PATENTED OR PATENT PENDING USES[/u][/i][/b] It was not made illegal cuz it gets you high and original post did not say that specific use of it either---> thats what im saying On criminalization of it; Ive offered historical proof; legal proof and academic proof of that.
-
Ok. I see the way this is going. It seems I am not feeding the argument you want and you are not feeding my points either. I don't see a point in arguing if we can't establish a common ground to begin. This is in no way a concession. I just can't see continuing to post points you are simply going to ignore.
-
Edited by DarthBrando: 10/16/2015 7:09:53 PMNvm what i had in this response bout proportional response wrong thread sry lol An yea thats fine
-
Lol it's ok.