JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

11/6/2015 12:32:42 AM
2
You're still making no sense at all, as you're applying real life consequences to a video game where you can survive an entire clip from an auto rifle. It's pretty obvious all games have some hint of realism, as all stories have morals you can apply to real life and the fact that characters are humans, but none would ever fathom to take into detail tht you're going through. It's a weak counter argument and should be revised. It's as simply as that. A sniper shouldn't be able to kill overshield players, as the mechanic of the overshield is to prevent Rez camping and allow players another chance.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • So in that case you're also saying nerf shotguns again because they one hit a rez. As well as supers, blink strike from behind, heavy weapons, and trip mine grenades?? All those 1 hit a rez might as well nerf them too. -blam!-in idiots in these forums always crying for a nerf.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • That's your opinion and as I do agree that it is a weak argument bringing realism to fantasy. I'm just stating my reasoning for why that mechanic is still apart of destiny and will most likely never change. However, when you said I wasn't making any sense still, I disagree with that I feel like I covered up my argument as possible as I could regardless of the base arguments strength.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]That's your opinion[/quote] Well, duh. I believe every argument is subjective.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Not exactly when historians debate about an event from the past by making a hypothesis on some obscure civilization they could be stating facts, that some think are opinions until proven otherwise. But that's the only exception I can think of. (Not sure if this counts, but I believe it does)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon