{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/14/2017 7:29:33 AM
1
Wow you're one arrogant pr*ck haha
No I didn't actually read your reply, I blindfolded myself and let autocorrect make the answer for me.
It's you fine I'll let you get the last reply so you can get your imaginary "win"
The fact that you think that grammar is more of a marker for someone's intelligence than how logical or reasonable the ideas that they have are is mind blowing.
It also means we will never be able to have a proper conversation because you, atop your high horse would rather find a way to look down on someone than try and see past minor details to understand the point someone is really trying to make
English
-
Seriously, you either can't read or can't think. Saying, [quote]Grammar is a more fundamental skill than logic, so getting it wrong is a worse mistake,[/quote] is not/not the same as saying, [quote]Good grammar is a better sign of intelligence than solid logic.[/quote] Further, it's pretty silly to say that grammar is irrelevant in written communication, and it's somehow the reader's obligation to wade through unintelligible crap to see if, maybe, there's an underlying good idea in there somewhere. It isn't. Just as there's no such thing as a great portrait poorly painted, there's no such thing as a great story poorly told. All of which, however, is irrelevant to the original point: the irony of calling someone stupid while misusing the language. Grammar is neither optional nor irrelevant. [i]Especially[/i] in a discussion about logic.
