{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Secular Sevens
9/17/2013 8:31:22 AM
30
Science (when done right) proves the Genesis account of creation and the power of God's spoken word.
English
-
Edited by Kalameet: 5/1/2014 12:32:18 AMA year later and I'm still "watting."
-
Guys please, don't bother replying to Hitman. It's a very lost cause.
-
No it doesn't.
-
Please, expand.
-
Edited by H 1 T M A N 182: 9/17/2013 9:06:09 PMWell without going into too many details, the recent findings in the area of quantum physics without a doubt point to creationism as truth, even for the evolutionist, the findings are undeniable.
-
You most certainly are going to have to go into "too many details" in order to prove your point.
-
Lol I don't have to prove anything, you need to search out the matter for yourself. I am just trying to point you in the right direction. The material is too much to try and post in a forum.
-
Edited by Mr Shojo Rising: 9/17/2013 9:14:31 PMLol. Isn't that fucking convenient? You don't have the material to back up your outrageous claim. I think we're done here.
-
Science has the materials. If you cared enough to find the truth I would figure you would search it out. I'm not going to spoon feed you, time to grow up and feed yourself.
-
The burden of proof is on you, and everyone in this group knows it.
-
That's just a cop-out for Atheists. They say "All you religious morons have no proof thus are all wrong" Guess what, the people who first said the earth was not the center of the universe had no proof. Atheists have no proof to support heir own claims, yet claim God's non-existance should be accepted as fact. The people who first though of atoms had no proof, but they were right.
-
[url=http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php]Since we are cherry-picking[/url]...
-
I have provided the proof. Go look up sub atomic particles. Read on locality, read the studies on light and time. Do just a little bit for yourself, it'll be more satisfying when you uncover how awesome the universe is and better yet, the God who made it.
-
Edited by dr0cx: 9/17/2013 9:42:57 PM[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_(truth)]Proof[/url] - This one requires citations, preferably from peer reviewed sources or expert sources. [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion]What you've provided[/url] - You've repeated your opinion several times and almost reached the fallacious proof by assertion, but not quite. If you want to comment on how science proves genesis with quantum physics, then you should be prepared to demonstrate that with more than suggesting we go to our nearest search engine. Because really, [url=http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=quantum+physics+proves+genesis+&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C26&as_sdtp=]there aren't any results here[/url].
-
Just saying "sub atomic particles prove god exists" is not proof. Show me the proof that subatomic particles proves the existence of god.
-
I'm saying go google it and see what it says. I don't want you to take my word for it, go research it for yourself, why is that so wrong to ask? I'm just saying the proof is there, I've read it.
-
[google]do subatomic particles prove god exists[/google]. Nothing remotely scientific to support your argument.
-
Lol go a bit deeper.. Like quantum physics and read about the universe as more of a digital realm than an infinite one.
-
Edited by Mr Shojo Rising: 9/17/2013 9:46:52 PM[google]quantum theory proves god exists[/google] Still nothing.
-
How about you knock off the wild goose chase and just link me articles that support your position.
-
Here's one
-
Edited by dr0cx: 9/18/2013 3:14:53 AMThere's a very good reason that Physics courses aren't taught by evangelicals whose only focus of academic rigor is religion. The only thing this video proves is that Chuck Missler barely demonstrates a rudimentary understanding of this topic. When the ignorant teach to the ignorant, you can shoehorn any meaning you want into it.
-
You're wrong
-
Chuck Missler is not a scientist.
-
Edited by H 1 T M A N 182: 9/17/2013 10:12:35 PMLol I know but he's reporting on what scientists have found. Did you even watch the clip?
