Name-calling and flaming isnt my forte kid. This example you gave was to just fill the gap of what youd say would be a pragmatic assumption. The assumption that people would hate enough to downvote and upvote asweel as make the comments. But i as an example only comment and do not like/dislike posts. I upvoted your post but im commenting against you. What does that make of me? Mute? Down the middle? Neither for or against? A zero? Well obviously my comments have some value if the OP is reaponding to me. A flawed perception of the situation you carry sir. Likes cant compare to comments. Which is why its useless to argue that the more likes you have, the more objective your claim is.
English
-
[quote] But i as an example only comment and do not like/dislike posts. I upvoted your post but im commenting against you. What does that make of me?[/quote] "Says that he doesn`t down/upvote" "Claims to have upvoted my post" "Comments against me" You are one of the 5% I mentioned above, simple as that. Or you are one that flips a coin that tells him if he should up/downvote and then doesn`t (because he remembered that he doesn`t vote,), either way I perfectly captured your fuzzy-logic with the Number Example I gave. btw: If you you would have read any of my other threads on [url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Topics/0/Default/None/bullshit]#Bullshit[/url] you would have seen your faux-pas in this sentence: [quote]Name-calling and flaming isnt my forte [b]kid[/b][/quote] You could only have made yourself sounding more "Passive-aggressive" by starting your sentence with [quote]Lol, name -calling and flaming isn`t my forte, kiddo[/quote]
-
The hostility you sense is null. If kid had a negative connotation then my psn username would be an insult unto myself. The example- the variables are reflected upon your examples, which are illogical. Simply stated a point that the status of your likes are invalid due to the cause that likes and comments arn't stemmed to the same system of which you rate your post. If i post a topic about how -blam!- is bad and it isnt upvoted. That doesnt mean everyone here is s rapist. It means we lack the effort to voice our opinions on the matter or choose to not interact with the topic. The voting pool isnt solid enough for there be a popular vote. Too many variables. Which is why i see your argument of likes, void.
-
Edited by GouldBerg988: 12/25/2014 9:05:33 PMNow you are loosing it, my man ;-) (Not the argument, that one got lost by you 2 posts in the past already)
-
Dude, I just want psn up. :/
-
I feel exploited by you, as a "Cant Play Destiny"-extra. Reported.
-
Lol, hey i needed something to kill some time. You were very [b]useful[/b] with doing that good sir.
-
-blam!- is censored? Really?